Legislative advocacy for the roadway safety industry

ATSSA’s Government Relations Team is here to help the roadway safety industry educate decision-makers on the state and federal level, to advocate for roadway safety infrastructure policies and funding. Learn more about ATSSA’s grassroots advocacy to advance policies that move us Toward Zero Deaths on our nation’s roadways and how you can get involved.

Cutting the gas tax is a COST we can't afford. Learn more now.

Get Involved


Join us in promoting state and
federal level policies that make
our roads safer.

Political Action Committee


The PAC provides support to policy makers on Capitol Hill that support roadway safety.

Federal Advocacy


Passionately advocating for
roadway safety infrastructure on
Capitol Hill.



Bringing together ATSSA members from across the country in a united voice for roadway safety.

State Advocacy


Connecting ATSSA chapters with
state-level grass roots efforts
across the country.

Toward Zero Deaths


TZD is a national strategy on highway safety that advocates for eliminating injury & death on roadways.

Advocacy news & blogs

Task Force 13 holds 2018 Spring Meeting, addresses issues with roadway infrastructure
SuperUser Account

Task Force 13 holds 2018 Spring Meeting, addresses issues with roadway infrastructure

The Task Force 13 (TF13) 2018 Spring Meeting was held in April in Lincoln, Nebraska, following the Midwest Pooled Fund Program.

The program allows Departments of Transportation (DOTs), Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) divisions, and other entities to pool resources to reach shared goals within the transportation industry.

The joint meeting kicked off with a crash test (the Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) Test No. 3-30 into Three Beam Bullnose System) at the Midwest Roadside Safety Facility. The crash test preceded panel discussions on topics related to the roadway safety industry and state DOTs.

“The joint meeting is a prime opportunity to increase communication and support collaborative efforts between various public agencies and private entities within the roadway safety and infrastructure industry,” said ATSSA Senior Technical Advisor Eric Perry. “Additionally, it allows industry professionals to share information and address high priorities to increase safety for roadway users.”

Perry, who participated on two panels, answered questions about state DOT training requirements for MASH products and on the potential standardization of Qualified Products List/Approved Products List (QPL/APL) process from state to state.

Steve Conway of Nucor Steel Marion, Inc. also discussed the cost implications of all the testing that is required by MASH on all devices and all configurations.

Following the joint meeting, TF13 met to discuss current issues regarding roadside safety hardware. The meeting focused on subcommittees that concentrate on specific roadside issues, which include:

  • Publications maintenance
  • Barrier hardware review groups
  • Bridge railing and transition hardware
  • Drainage hardware
  • Sign, luminaire and traffic signal support hardware
  • Work zone hardware
  • Certification of test facilities
  • Rail highway crossing hardware
  • Marketing
  • Computational mechanics
  • Delineation

A summary was provided on website updates as well as the Task Force 13 Hardware Guide updates. A new website ( was formed to hold the TF guide.

Subcommittee 11, Delineation, focused on Florida’s testing of flexible delineators. Florida is developing a new specification that requires delineators to be hit at 70 mph successfully up to 200 times. Additional discussion focused on the transition from the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 350 testing criteria to the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) MASH criteria.

The AASHTO MASH, updated in 2016, provides adopted crash-testing procedures for use in assessing roadside safety hardware. Questions remain on how each state is going to implement MASH as the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) role has shifted and AASHTO’s role is only in the development of the criteria, and not implementation.

Finally, the TF13 group is in the process of forming a non-profit entity to do business and interact with other organizations.

To learn more about the history of MASH criteria and implementation, view a video narrated by ATSSA CEO and President Roger Wentz. Stay tuned to the ATSSA Blog for more updates and send all technical questions to ATSSA's Tech Corner in The Flash e-Newsletter.

6267 Rate this article:
No rating
Please login or register to post comments.