Pavement Marking

Pavement Marking

Pavement Marking

In a report developed by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), it was recommended that the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) establish plans to “better manage” initiatives and efforts related to Connected Automated Vehicles (CAVs). GAO officials state within the report, which was released in November 2017, that their reasoning behind the research efforts are based on the potential promise of CAVs to provide transformative safety and mobility benefits, but these benefits also will come with a set of safety and infrastructure challenges for policymakers.


While it also was noted that other components such as urban versus rural settings and local ownership of roadways will play a hand in infrastructure adaptations, many experts in automation and infrastructure back up the report’s claims, and assert that consistent and proper maintenance of the current roadway system is of the upmost importance for conventional and AV motorists — especially when it comes to pavement markings.


ATSSA has a dedicated group of members on its Pavement Marking Committee (member login required), who are working to assert the proper maintenance of pavement marking and advance technologies being developed to help increase safety benefits and accommodation of CAVs. The committee has developed a list of policies and continues to work toward advancing the collaboration between the roadway safety industry and automakers as America progresses toward an automated future.

Resources

Pam

MASH scoping study discussed during AASHTO Virtual Spring Meeting 2021

During AASHTO's 2021 Virtual Spring Meeting on Monday, the Council on Highways and Streets (CHS) gathered to provide updates from various stakeholders. The discussion included an update on the Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) scoping study to determine the feasibility and potential next steps to convert MASH into a set of performance specifications.

Joyce Taylor from the Maine Department of Transportation (MaineDOT), who serves as design vice chair with AASHTO, gave an update on the MASH scoping study conducted by Texas A&M Transportation Institute (TTI). She discussed the challenges related to current testing procedures and the gray areas within the existing manual that lead to a lack of consistency, as testing may be conducted differently by facilities.

The scoping study, conducted by TTI and sponsored by AASHTO, was completed in April. The purpose of the study was to investigate the time, cost and steps needed to convert MASH into a set of performance specifications. As a result, AASHTO is considering proceeding with the conversion of the document. The study accomplished the following tasks:

  • Revision of existing specs/test methods and recommendation of an appropriate format.
  • Tasks required to convert MASH.
  • Level of effort and timelines required for the conversion.
  • Draft final report and research problem statements for potential next steps.

 

The desired outcomes from the conversion of MASH into a set of performance specifications are to:

  • Reduce subjectivity in testing and provide clearly defined crash testing criteria
  • Revise format and organization of the document
  • Simplify instructions and increase the level of certainty in crash testing (to help manufacturers know what tests to run).

 

AASHTO's next steps are:

  • Review by AASHTO committees (TCRS, Design, Bridges, Traffic Engineering)
  • Input from industry cross section (ATSSA, Task Force 13, other industry representatives, academia, crash test facilities)

 

AASHTO anticipates providing outreach and communication over the next several months with the hopes of providing an update during AASHTO's fall meeting.

ATSSA Director of Innovation & Technical Services Eric Perry authored this post.

Print
4401 Rate this article:
No rating
Please login or register to post comments.

Altai.Integration.AzureB2CDNNModule

Text/HTML